Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Asbestos Mine Site Visit


On Friday March 30th, Katie, Ryan, and Myself made the trip out to Lowell, Vermont to visit the old asbestos mine.  We met Leslie White, a community member who knows everything about the mine and has worked very hard to educate the citizens of Lowell about the correct information regarding the mine.  When we got to the mine Leslie unlocked the main gate and we entered onto the property.  Despite the big locked gate at the entrance to the property, one could also easily enter onto the property simply by walking around the side of the gate.  Leslie described the mine back in the days of its peak operation.  She said it was like its own little city…with employees working around the clock in 3 shifts per day.  She explained how the employees received a good pay and how the mine was the center of the towns economy back then.  Leslies story then skipped many years forward to an incident in 2004 in which a town member found some of the old pilings from the mine in the wetlands on his property.  This guy thought this was not cool and raised a fuss about it.  The state of Vermont conducted a health study of the old mine site.  The study was released and made the mine look like a dangerous place full of toxicity.  It came out that the study was full of errors and the results that had been released to the public were flawed.  Lowell’s economy today is highly dependant upon seasonal rental properties.  After the health study was released a huge number of people were calling in to cancel their rentals and thus the economy took a hit.  Leslie worked hard to get the state to retract its health study and after 3 years they finally took it off the website.  This incident caused a great deal of mistrust between the people of Lowell and the state.  Leslie felt that these people who were supposed to be looking after the town and its citizens had let them down in a major way.  Leslie says that to this day the town has yet to recover from this incident.  After this incident Leslie and 4 others formed a committee.  Their purpose was to act as “fact finders” and present the correct well researched information to the people of the town.  Leslie and the other members of the committee played a huge role in educating people to make an informed decision about the superfund status of the site.  Leslie explained to us that “there are no asbestos fibers blowing around here”.  The mine has had mitigation work done on it and is not a big threat to human health in the area. 
            Leslie went on to describe the superfund process to us.  The way it works os that the town has to say yes to superfund status before the EPA will give them any information about the clean up plan or process.  After saying yes, the EPA has a 3-5 year period to do as they see necessary to clean up the site.  Additionally, the state has to agree to cover 10% of the estimated cost of the project.  Cleaning up the mine would be a huge process with a very large price tag.  It would involve moving the pilings of waste back into the quarry, which might in fact be more dangerous than just leaving them be as they are.  The community was not satisfied with this process and did not see this intense “fix” to be aligned with the threat that the mine poses.  The community vote was overwhelmingly against the superfund status and many believe that some remediation work would be sufficient.  The town feels that it is important to look at all the possible options that could be done to clean up the site.  They are looking to examples of other mine clean up projects around the world.  Leslie explained that “any money they spend up here is not going to save any human life…”  A rough estimate for what the state would have to cover if the site did attain superfund site status would be 25 million dollars.  Isn’t there some more beneficial things the state could do with this huge amount of money that would benefit more people?
            The site visit really trough into focus for me the different levels of involvement on the community, state, and national level.  It is a trick thing to get these levels working together and in the case of the Lowell asbestos mine, not all parties involved were on the same page.  There seems to be a lot of misconceptions out there about the mine and its potential health effects.  The main environmental hazard posed by the mine is erosion into the streams surrounding the mine site.  IT has been shown that some aquatic biota is damaged in the parts of the streams near to the mine but further down this problem does not exist.  When the water that fills the quarry is tested it shows drinking water quality. 
            Leslies story was very captivating and full of information that we had not previously found in our research.  We left the site visit and interview with a new understand of how powerful listening to a community’s story can be.  We also left considering and questioning the role of the media in this issue.  Why is it that we had to travel all the way out to Lowell in order to get the whole story?  The site visit was very worthwhile and proved to be an enjoyable afternoon for all.  






No comments:

Post a Comment