Lowell Asbestos Mine
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Truth Behind the Tailings: A Visit to the Lowell Asbestos Mine
KEEP OUT!
Like threats of a trespassing sign, the information available on asbestos contamination in Eden and Lowell seemed to be keeping something out. Health studies concluded asbestos related deaths in the area and contamination of air and downstream water sources from an inactive mine. So why wouldn't the people who are supposedly most effected by asbestos contamination vote in favor of a Superfund process? Eden local Leslie White, an expert and activist against Superfund gave us a side of the story you can't find in government documents and popular articles.
The Vermont Asbestos Group mine was a focal point of economic stability for Eden and Lowell residents. The mine provided jobs, and although posed a health risk, provided income for many families in the area. Leslie noted, "Yes, these men knew the risks involved. But when you have 6 children to feed, future health concerns are less of a priority." It wasn't until the state conducted a health study that inactive asbestos tailings became a concern.
Inactive Asbestos Tailings
The results of the State health study left locals enraged. Leslie argued that until the study was published, there was no worry about asbestos in the area. Out of staters vacationed in their rental homes, and locals went about their daily life. Yet after the study was made public, what once was considered to be quaint, rejuvenating mountain land was perceived as toxic, frightful, wasteland- thanks to nation wide media.
View of Tailings and Quarry
The worst part about such powerful negative media is that the study was flawed. Not only did the property value and economic growth in Eden and Lowell spiral downward, it was inaccurately conjectured. The five asbestos related deaths referred to in the study were due to direct occupational exposure, and the amount of asbestos found in nearby water was minuscule; proven to be less harmful than city drinking water. I found particular interest in why the State would publish erroneous information. How could state officials, who consider themselves professional, make such devastating and careless mistakes?
Eden Local Leslie White looks onto proposed area for a Biomass Plant
Leslie suggested that the State may have been up to something. In order to become a Superfund Site, there needs to be legitimate human health concerns and proof of contamination. It is possible that the State, in attempt to provide the EPA with work, misconstrued the evidence of the health study. Despite the questionable motives of State government, it is my understanding that the flawed health study did more damage to the townships of Eden and Lowell than asbestos did.
Livelihoods Abandoned, Seen Through a Chain Link Fence
My experience at the Vermont Asbestos Group Mine with Brianna and Ryan undoubtedly changed the way I view the Superfund controversy. Previously, I felt that the residents of Eden and Lowell blindly ignored the environmental impacts of asbestos contamination in hopes to save falling property values. Now I realize the complexity of the situation, the stakeholders involved and devastating role media has played in environmental policy.
Ryan and I Posing Under the VAG Sign
Ryan and Brianna Posing in Front of Abandoned Mine Equipment
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Asbestos Mine Site Visit
On Friday March 30th,
Katie, Ryan, and Myself made the trip out to Lowell, Vermont to visit the old
asbestos mine. We met Leslie
White, a community member who knows everything about the mine and has worked
very hard to educate the citizens of Lowell about the correct information
regarding the mine. When we got to
the mine Leslie unlocked the main gate and we entered onto the property. Despite the big locked gate at the
entrance to the property, one could also easily enter onto the property simply
by walking around the side of the gate.
Leslie described the mine back in the days of its peak operation. She said it was like its own little
city…with employees working around the clock in 3 shifts per day. She explained how the employees
received a good pay and how the mine was the center of the towns economy back
then. Leslies story then skipped
many years forward to an incident in 2004 in which a town member found some of
the old pilings from the mine in the wetlands on his property. This guy thought this was not cool and
raised a fuss about it. The state
of Vermont conducted a health study of the old mine site. The study was released and made the
mine look like a dangerous place full of toxicity. It came out that the study was full of errors and the
results that had been released to the public were flawed. Lowell’s economy today is highly
dependant upon seasonal rental properties. After the health study was released a huge number of people
were calling in to cancel their rentals and thus the economy took a hit. Leslie worked hard to get the state to
retract its health study and after 3 years they finally took it off the
website. This incident caused a
great deal of mistrust between the people of Lowell and the state. Leslie felt that these people who were
supposed to be looking after the town and its citizens had let them down in a
major way. Leslie says that to
this day the town has yet to recover from this incident. After this incident Leslie and 4 others
formed a committee. Their purpose
was to act as “fact finders” and present the correct well researched
information to the people of the town.
Leslie and the other members of the committee played a huge role in
educating people to make an informed decision about the superfund status of the
site. Leslie explained to us that
“there are no asbestos fibers blowing around here”. The mine has had mitigation work done on it and is not a big
threat to human health in the area.
Leslie
went on to describe the superfund process to us. The way it works os that the town has to say yes to
superfund status before the EPA will give them any information about the clean
up plan or process. After saying
yes, the EPA has a 3-5 year period to do as they see necessary to clean up the
site. Additionally, the state has
to agree to cover 10% of the estimated cost of the project. Cleaning up the mine would be a huge
process with a very large price tag.
It would involve moving the pilings of waste back into the quarry, which
might in fact be more dangerous than just leaving them be as they are. The community was not satisfied with
this process and did not see this intense “fix” to be aligned with the threat
that the mine poses. The community
vote was overwhelmingly against the superfund status and many believe that some
remediation work would be sufficient.
The town feels that it is important to look at all the possible options
that could be done to clean up the site.
They are looking to examples of other mine clean up projects around the
world. Leslie explained that “any
money they spend up here is not going to save any human life…” A rough estimate for what the state
would have to cover if the site did attain superfund site status would be 25
million dollars. Isn’t there some
more beneficial things the state could do with this huge amount of money that
would benefit more people?
The
site visit really trough into focus for me the different levels of involvement
on the community, state, and national level. It is a trick thing to get these levels working together and
in the case of the Lowell asbestos mine, not all parties involved were on the
same page. There seems to be a lot
of misconceptions out there about the mine and its potential health effects. The main environmental hazard posed by
the mine is erosion into the streams surrounding the mine site. IT has been shown that some aquatic
biota is damaged in the parts of the streams near to the mine but further down
this problem does not exist. When
the water that fills the quarry is tested it shows drinking water quality.
Leslies
story was very captivating and full of information that we had not previously
found in our research. We left the
site visit and interview with a new understand of how powerful listening to a
community’s story can be. We also
left considering and questioning the role of the media in this issue. Why is it that we had to travel all the
way out to Lowell in order to get the whole story? The site visit was very worthwhile and proved to be an
enjoyable afternoon for all.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Primary Source Document: Mesothelioma from ChrysotileAsbestos: Update
By Marty S. Kanarek
The tailings of the Lowell asbestos mine remain onsite, with minimal regulation and less then adequate safety measures being taken to protect from the potential harms of the mineral. There are a variety of types of asbestos; the negative health consequences of some are better understood than others. Chrysotile asbestos, the type of asbestos that stayed behind as a firm legacy when the mining companies moved out, still inspires medical controversy concerning its human health impacts. This primary source compilies evidence supporting the hypothesis that chrysotile asbestos can lead to mesothelioma. It also mentions numerous other cancers that chrysotile asbestos has been connected to. Due to overwhelming support for a strong causal relationship between chrysotile asbestos and cancers like mesothelioma, the author, Marty S. Kanarek, advocates for an international ban on all types of asbestos. The old Lowell mine site is coated in chrysotile asbestos. Citizens who live nearby, or individuals who visit the site for curiousity or recreation, are potentially in danger because of the powerful, crippling properties of asbestos. If looked at in the context of the Lowell asbestos mine, and the nearby public, this article is an urgent call to action. Clean up is imperative, and time is not going to be generous with chrysotile asbestos.
Article found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279711001803
The tailings of the Lowell asbestos mine remain onsite, with minimal regulation and less then adequate safety measures being taken to protect from the potential harms of the mineral. There are a variety of types of asbestos; the negative health consequences of some are better understood than others. Chrysotile asbestos, the type of asbestos that stayed behind as a firm legacy when the mining companies moved out, still inspires medical controversy concerning its human health impacts. This primary source compilies evidence supporting the hypothesis that chrysotile asbestos can lead to mesothelioma. It also mentions numerous other cancers that chrysotile asbestos has been connected to. Due to overwhelming support for a strong causal relationship between chrysotile asbestos and cancers like mesothelioma, the author, Marty S. Kanarek, advocates for an international ban on all types of asbestos. The old Lowell mine site is coated in chrysotile asbestos. Citizens who live nearby, or individuals who visit the site for curiousity or recreation, are potentially in danger because of the powerful, crippling properties of asbestos. If looked at in the context of the Lowell asbestos mine, and the nearby public, this article is an urgent call to action. Clean up is imperative, and time is not going to be generous with chrysotile asbestos.
Article found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279711001803
Primary Documentation: Summary of 2009 Biological and Chemical assessments within Burgess Branch, Hutchins Brook, Dark Branch and Gihon watersheds
Data Summary and Findings: Vermont Asbestos Group Mine
This document is a summary of a study the EPA in 2008. Soil, air, and dusts samples were collected from the Burgins Branch, Hutchins Brook, Dark Branch, and the Gihon Watersheds, to document asbestos amounts and see if any off-site asbestos exposure was present. Essentially, the study was conducted to see if asbestos is released into the air and could be inhaled by people living near the mine site. Data collected showed that asbestos was present in the air, soil, dust, and materials in surrounding buildings. Out of 66 samples, chrysotile asbestos was detected in 55 of them. Asbestos was found in all the dust samples. Based on this data collected, the Agency recommended several measures. These include restricting access to the mine site, restricting the re-use of tailings, and continuing to monitor the mine site for exposure risks.
Link: http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/wastediv/SMS/VAG/ATSDR-August%202009%20VAG%20Data%20Summary%20and%20Findings.pdf
This document is a summary of a study the EPA in 2008. Soil, air, and dusts samples were collected from the Burgins Branch, Hutchins Brook, Dark Branch, and the Gihon Watersheds, to document asbestos amounts and see if any off-site asbestos exposure was present. Essentially, the study was conducted to see if asbestos is released into the air and could be inhaled by people living near the mine site. Data collected showed that asbestos was present in the air, soil, dust, and materials in surrounding buildings. Out of 66 samples, chrysotile asbestos was detected in 55 of them. Asbestos was found in all the dust samples. Based on this data collected, the Agency recommended several measures. These include restricting access to the mine site, restricting the re-use of tailings, and continuing to monitor the mine site for exposure risks.
Link: http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/wastediv/SMS/VAG/ATSDR-August%202009%20VAG%20Data%20Summary%20and%20Findings.pdf
Popular Article: Repurposing Eden Mines
By David Hallquist
Historically, the impact of the Lowell asbestos mines cannot be overstated. Local communities depended on the mines for over a century before its production was promptly halted in 1993. Since then, the mining property has ceased to yield anything, and has not been applied to any purpose besides being a dump for hazardous asbestos mine tailings. Employment in the area has become a problem. Directing the area towards a renewed and useful future, while creating jobs, would be the ideal situation for these mines. The Lamoille Economic Development Corporation has suggested such a fresh, nonhazardous rehabilitation, to be located on the old-mine site. Biomass, created through tree plantations, could be produced in the area, with easy transportation to powerplants or liquefying operations because of the existing mine infrastructure. Employment would be resurrected with the proposed implementation of biomass production. Before this progressive condition can be attained, however, the mines must first be cleaned. The controversial Superfund status must be secured so that the Lowell mines region can develop into a stronger environmental and economic community.
Article located at: http://vtdigger.org/2012/01/29/hallquist-repurposing-eden-mines/
Historically, the impact of the Lowell asbestos mines cannot be overstated. Local communities depended on the mines for over a century before its production was promptly halted in 1993. Since then, the mining property has ceased to yield anything, and has not been applied to any purpose besides being a dump for hazardous asbestos mine tailings. Employment in the area has become a problem. Directing the area towards a renewed and useful future, while creating jobs, would be the ideal situation for these mines. The Lamoille Economic Development Corporation has suggested such a fresh, nonhazardous rehabilitation, to be located on the old-mine site. Biomass, created through tree plantations, could be produced in the area, with easy transportation to powerplants or liquefying operations because of the existing mine infrastructure. Employment would be resurrected with the proposed implementation of biomass production. Before this progressive condition can be attained, however, the mines must first be cleaned. The controversial Superfund status must be secured so that the Lowell mines region can develop into a stronger environmental and economic community.
Article located at: http://vtdigger.org/2012/01/29/hallquist-repurposing-eden-mines/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)